The most likely cause is an error in your network's firewall configuration or NAT. This is probably for security reasons, as this protocol is generally not designed for use outside the local network. I threw many of those modems in the bin. settings? have a peek at this web-site
Your computer's clock is 343 seconds fast. Early Christmas Present from TekSavvy [TekSavvy] by HEDENHOLD712. Instead of the expected IP address, we received this request from 188.8.131.52. It's a mystery to me how they are set when in "Automatic".
However, it may be the opposite and my Zyxel unit may just skip one LCP step because it is not needed to negociate any asyncmap option. Your ISP's DNS server is capable of fetching records using IPv6. Eambo Recruiter 11-07-2010 Well some Routers (I don't know about modems, doubt it) have built in firewalls - if you're having this issue directly in the modem then I doubt it's I'll play around with the encryption type meanwhile to see if that has any effect I am also set to open DNS Grandpaonfire, Sep 27, 2014 #3 plodr Liz Joined:
I didn't even have a chance to launch LOL... Then my pc just runs straight to the router. Direct UDP access to remote VoIP servers (port 7082) is allowed. Its really unpredictable which can be very annoying and i have spoken to my ISP numerous times over the last 2 years and all they want to do is send me
I have no idea what's going on in your country. However, I don't know if it is a pppoe, pppd or ISP problem. I've run the Netalyzr test ( http://netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/index.html ) with DMZ enabled and disabled, which is how I've pinpointed the issue to the Tomato firewall. Xdpker posted Dec 22, 2016 at 8:50 PM No IPv6 connection when N66W is...
hmm nice Country - South Korea Posted by alex3064on Jan 3, 2014 9:07:29 PMQuote https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/ This may help for your DNS latency, did you replace DNS in router and in your Direct TCP connections to remote TOR servers (port 9001) succeed, but do not receive the expected content.The connection succeeded but came from a different IP address than we expected. Direct TCP access to remote PPTP Control servers (port 1723) is allowed. I did not have any idea what that is, until I saw it once again in: Start->All programs-> ID_String3->(subfolder ID_String4)--> ID_String5.exe with a LOL logo....
Click to expand... Thanks. +1 Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it. The version of pppd used is 2.4.5 from the folks at samba.org, which is the latest and last updated 2009 (yes, 4 years ago). It seems to me that ADSL filter is needed for your type of connection to have broadband and voice connection work side by side.
For example I cannot explain what LCP type 0xc8 (200) is -- I can't find any documentation on it. http://mixtecadigital.com/unable-to/unable-to-receive-offline-ims.html We recorded a packet loss of 1.0%. BagOfQuef Junior Member 11-07-2010 Shedoxhu, if you don't mind, can you find a solution to my problem? :X I'm having problems cooling my PC. -1 Comment below rating threshold, click here Your DNS resolver requests DNSSEC records.
The maximum packet successfully received was 1472 bytes of payload. Direct UDP access to remote IPSec NAT servers (port 4500) is allowed. Direct TCP access to remote IMAP/SSL servers (port 993) is allowed. http://mixtecadigital.com/unable-to/unable-to-receive-mails.html It might be.
No, create an account now. Direct TCP access to remote OpenVPN servers (port 1194) is allowed. It's a separate issue, and one that really isn't an issue at all -- whoever decided on those "recommended defaults" (in transmission) made the assumption the program would never be run
This suggests that your network enforces a mandatory SMTP proxy which may or may not allow you to send email directly from your system. Shedoxhu Member 11-07-2010 thanks for the quick reply, Eambo but as I said in the first post- I've plugged the modem directly into the computer, and same problem occurred. Before posting we recommend you search our extensive Knowledge Base or the forum archives as an answer to your query may already be available. Cheers, Mike.
C:\Documents and Settings\Kirk> 0/ 100 = 0% | 2 96ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 172.16.0.1 1/ 100 = 1% | 3 --- 100/ 100 =100% 99/ 100 Have you experienced any issues with real applications? You can read about the details here: http://www.linuxtopia.org/Linux_Firewall_iptables/x4700.html The default rule in TomatoUSB is iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu; you can see this for yourself http://mixtecadigital.com/unable-to/unable-to-receive-data.html Direct TCP access to remote SMTP/SSL servers (port 465) is allowed.
Is it possible that Tomato blocks those ICMP "too big" packets ? Direct UDP access to remote Steam gaming servers (port 27015) is allowed. The most likely cause is an error in your network's firewall configuration or NAT. Play with Game Booster 9.
No transport problems were discovered which could affect the deployment of DNSSEC. Just in case: my DSL modem is SpeedTouch 516 in bridge mode. · actions · 2010-Apr-20 1:22 am · alpovs
However, I have really no idea how to fix this issue in my tomato router. I set both MTU and MRUU to 1458 (1454 + 4 from MLPPP) and the messages about problems with fragmented UDP traffic were gone. The client was able to receive fragmented UDP traffic. Gentoo Linux ░ nVidia 361.28-r2 ░ Wine 1.9.5 (win32 prefix) winetricks -q d3dx9_42 d3dcompiler_43 riched20 Posted by ionfaceon Jan 3, 2014 7:31:46 PMAlpha MemberQuote "ionface wrote:https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/361292 Run MTR while having bad
Direct UDP access to remote Slammer servers (port 1434) is blocked. Code: UDP connectivity (?): Note Basic UDP access is available. Direct UDP access to remote IKE key exchange servers (port 500) is blocked. You should be able to pick one up from Ebay quite cheap?
Direct UDP access to remote IKE key exchange servers (port 500) is allowed. My MTU is set as 1500 in the router.